Skip to main content

ARC-Learn Practitioner Guidebook: Practical Considerations for Implementing an Alternative Model of Undergraduate Research Experience

How to Use This Guidebook

This guidebook is designed to be used by anyone in higher education who is interested in learning more and potentially utilizing some alternative design features to make undergraduate research experiences (UREs) more inclusive. This includes undergraduate advisors, project Principal Investigators, education specialists, instructors, program coordinators and leadership. While this program centered on the geosciences and focused on student development as researchers in the natural/physical sciences, many of the “lessons-learned” have relevance across disciplines.

We use our experiences running the URE Authentic Research through Collaborative Learning (ARC-Learn), as well as our collective expertise in science education, student engagement, undergraduate student success and inclusive mentorship to inform the contents of this guidebook.

The guidebook is divided up into distinct, thematic sections. Each section has a brief introduction to the topic, a little about how we approached it in the ARC-Learn program, and considerations gleaned from our experiences and lessons learned. There is no need to read the sections in order. Feel free to skip around or only read the sections that interest you.

Systemic Barriers in Undergraduate Research Experiences

The ability to participate in an undergraduate research experience can be instrumental in helping a student move forward in their career. Conversely, lack of access to a high quality URE can hinder a student in obtaining future opportunities, often because of the informal “networking” and community building that comes along with internships and similar programs.

Exploring Solutions: Our Case Study

Authentic Research through Collaborative Learning (ARC-Learn) was designed to explore possible solutions to some of these systemic barriers by providing a low intensity, long duration research experience with no field work, utilizing best practices for inclusive mentorship and focusing in specifically on polar science.

How Do We Know?

Some of the components of ARC-Learn were wildly successful, while others led to unanticipated challenges for students and mentors. We used our experiences running two cohorts of this program to explore many facets of URE design, how they worked for us, and to offer considerations for other program designers.

National Science Foundation, Oregon State University STEM Research Center, and Oregon State University College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences

Made possible with funding by the National Science Foundation Award #2110854. The information contained here is those of the author(s) and does not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.